<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aiptek shows off new HD digital camcorders at CES 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/</link>
	<description>Technology Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-99793</link>
		<dc:creator>John Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/#comment-99793</guid>
		<description>Aiptek made ridiculously toy cameras up until recently. I bought one of their products and hated it and swore off aiptek. Then I tried the Go HD. The low light on their camera beats many, if not all of the similar products in its range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aiptek made ridiculously toy cameras up until recently. I bought one of their products and hated it and swore off aiptek. Then I tried the Go HD. The low light on their camera beats many, if not all of the similar products in its range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-99048</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/#comment-99048</guid>
		<description>Most tech blogs, if they stoop low enough (in their minds) to mention Aiptek, it&#039;s to trash the entire brand. Same with most camcorder forums. And as soon as one person (who may or may not have ever tried one for him/herself) starts talking trash about Aiptek, the rest of the techno-nerdo-sheep join in, again, whether they&#039;ve ever tried an Aiptek camera. Often, *if* they&#039;ve ever had an Aiptek, it was several years ago when the company was producing more pencams than anything else.

It&#039;s nice to see a tech blog that doesn&#039;t automatically dismiss Aiptek based on 1)other tech blogs&#039; opinions (such as Wired.com mindlessly agreeing with Gizmodo on the subject of Aiptek) or 2)the company&#039;s toycam history, from which it&#039;s clearly attempting to escape.

In any case, this particular blog post is being discussed here: 
http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=584912&amp;forum_id=92</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most tech blogs, if they stoop low enough (in their minds) to mention Aiptek, it&#8217;s to trash the entire brand. Same with most camcorder forums. And as soon as one person (who may or may not have ever tried one for him/herself) starts talking trash about Aiptek, the rest of the techno-nerdo-sheep join in, again, whether they&#8217;ve ever tried an Aiptek camera. Often, *if* they&#8217;ve ever had an Aiptek, it was several years ago when the company was producing more pencams than anything else.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see a tech blog that doesn&#8217;t automatically dismiss Aiptek based on 1)other tech blogs&#8217; opinions (such as Wired.com mindlessly agreeing with Gizmodo on the subject of Aiptek) or 2)the company&#8217;s toycam history, from which it&#8217;s clearly attempting to escape.</p>
<p>In any case, this particular blog post is being discussed here:<br />
<a href="http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=584912&amp;forum_id=92" rel="nofollow">http://forums.steves-digicams.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=584912&amp;forum_id=92</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax Blog &#187; Aiptek unveals the AHD300 and AHD500 Pro at CES 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-99043</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax Blog &#187; Aiptek unveals the AHD300 and AHD500 Pro at CES 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/#comment-99043</guid>
		<description>[...] only coverage so far of these new Aiptek camcorders was posted at http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/ and a discussion is going on about those new Aiptek HD camcorders at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only coverage so far of these new Aiptek camcorders was posted at <a href="http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/" rel="nofollow">http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/</a> and a discussion is going on about those new Aiptek HD camcorders at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-99042</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2008/01/13/aiptek-shows-off-new-hd-digital-camcorders-at-ces-2008/#comment-99042</guid>
		<description>Nice, this is like the only coverage these new cool looking camcorders have had on any blog as far as I&#039;ve seen.

1440x1080 progressive 30fps is better than 1920x1080 interlaced 60 fields per second such as the Sony and Panasonic ones. All Sony and Panasonic ones until the most recent were actually shooting 1440x1080 interlaced at 60 fields per second. And Sony and Panasonic always called that being HD camcorders.

I hope Aiptek improved the sound quality. Too bad you didn&#039;t take a sample video recording with it using one of your SD cards and put the sample video online for us to see and hear if Aiptek has improved the sound recording quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, this is like the only coverage these new cool looking camcorders have had on any blog as far as I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>1440&#215;1080 progressive 30fps is better than 1920&#215;1080 interlaced 60 fields per second such as the Sony and Panasonic ones. All Sony and Panasonic ones until the most recent were actually shooting 1440&#215;1080 interlaced at 60 fields per second. And Sony and Panasonic always called that being HD camcorders.</p>
<p>I hope Aiptek improved the sound quality. Too bad you didn&#8217;t take a sample video recording with it using one of your SD cards and put the sample video online for us to see and hear if Aiptek has improved the sound recording quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

