<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LG L222WT-BF 21.6 inch Widescreen LCD Monitor Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/</link>
	<description>Technology Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:11:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cheap computers</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-128046</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap computers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-128046</guid>
		<description>I decided to experiment and find out by getting the LG L222WT-BF 21.6 inch widescreen LCD monitor which was on sale this week (Week starting 11/18/2007) at Best Buy for $219.99 before taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to experiment and find out by getting the LG L222WT-BF 21.6 inch widescreen LCD monitor which was on sale this week (Week starting 11/18/2007) at Best Buy for $219.99 before taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-106282</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-106282</guid>
		<description>Did you even try it with the DVI?  Mine is markedly better in the colour and sharpness with the DVI connection....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you even try it with the DVI?  Mine is markedly better in the colour and sharpness with the DVI connection&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-103918</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-103918</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the typo but &quot;..after us them for the last three months&quot; should be &quot;...after USING them for the last three months&quot;. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the typo but &#8220;..after us them for the last three months&#8221; should be &#8220;&#8230;after USING them for the last three months&#8221;. <img src='http://www.krunker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-103917</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-103917</guid>
		<description>I have two of these.

An excellent purchase for the price and much better than I expected...since for the longest time I&#039;ve never been one of those who thought LCDs were as good as CRTs in terms of versatility. I&#039;m now convinced otherwise. 

No offense...but IMHO anyone who spends 30 minutes playing with the setup trying to get it &quot;picture perfect&quot; is being too picky...especially when they&#039;re fully aware of the pricepoint before installation.

These monitors are terrific for movies, gaming, surfing and just about anything else you&#039;ll likely do with your PC. There are no dead pixels in either monitor, the contrast and colours are uniform across my entire desktop and the viewing angles are entirely acceptable if you set the montitor height and angle correctly to your sitting position.

I am fortunate enough that I can afford to buy better monitors if I chose to but after us them for the last three months I have no reason to. I&#039;ll keep them until they explode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two of these.</p>
<p>An excellent purchase for the price and much better than I expected&#8230;since for the longest time I&#8217;ve never been one of those who thought LCDs were as good as CRTs in terms of versatility. I&#8217;m now convinced otherwise. </p>
<p>No offense&#8230;but IMHO anyone who spends 30 minutes playing with the setup trying to get it &#8220;picture perfect&#8221; is being too picky&#8230;especially when they&#8217;re fully aware of the pricepoint before installation.</p>
<p>These monitors are terrific for movies, gaming, surfing and just about anything else you&#8217;ll likely do with your PC. There are no dead pixels in either monitor, the contrast and colours are uniform across my entire desktop and the viewing angles are entirely acceptable if you set the montitor height and angle correctly to your sitting position.</p>
<p>I am fortunate enough that I can afford to buy better monitors if I chose to but after us them for the last three months I have no reason to. I&#8217;ll keep them until they explode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-103705</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-103705</guid>
		<description>I have exactly the same monitor, and I think you might have got a defective sample - the one I have is not especially bright (my NEC panel is noticably brighter), but the illumination is perfectly even.

The other interesting thing is that my monitor (brought in China) was supplied with both the VGA and DVI cables - although this seems to be standard for China (even HP ship their printers with cables here!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have exactly the same monitor, and I think you might have got a defective sample &#8211; the one I have is not especially bright (my NEC panel is noticably brighter), but the illumination is perfectly even.</p>
<p>The other interesting thing is that my monitor (brought in China) was supplied with both the VGA and DVI cables &#8211; although this seems to be standard for China (even HP ship their printers with cables here!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yolabel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LG L222WT-BF 21.6 inch Widescreen LCD Monitor Review</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-102858</link>
		<dc:creator>yolabel &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LG L222WT-BF 21.6 inch Widescreen LCD Monitor Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-102858</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hertha &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LG L222WT-BF 21.6 inch Widescreen LCD Monitor Review</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-102826</link>
		<dc:creator>hertha &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LG L222WT-BF 21.6 inch Widescreen LCD Monitor Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-102826</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flung</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-101597</link>
		<dc:creator>flung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-101597</guid>
		<description>Trala,
  That&#039;s not entirely true. We&#039;re talking about brightness - not whether a graphics card/chipset can drive at a certain resolution/frequency. I&#039;m sorry but it&#039;s silly to say that a modern graphics card will have a &quot;quality loss&quot; if it &quot;sucks&quot;. Driving a monitor at 1680 x 1050 is a function of whether one has enough framebuffer memory to hold all the information necessary to render a single frame. Once rasterized, the information is simply sent over the wire to the monitor. I will concur that a VGA connection is less than ideal than say a DVI connection since we&#039;re talking about an analog vs. a digital connection. However, the ability to render at 1680 x 1050 is independent of that feature. You don&#039;t need a high end graphics card to render at that resolution. 
Having said that - you DO need a better graphics card if you wanted to play 3D games at an acceptable frame rate. Again - a function of memory and how many shaders (and how much is done in hardware vs. software).

My beefs with this monitor had everything to do with brightness. Could it be indicative of the VGA connection? Possibly but if that&#039;s the case, even that&#039;s unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trala,<br />
  That&#8217;s not entirely true. We&#8217;re talking about brightness &#8211; not whether a graphics card/chipset can drive at a certain resolution/frequency. I&#8217;m sorry but it&#8217;s silly to say that a modern graphics card will have a &#8220;quality loss&#8221; if it &#8220;sucks&#8221;. Driving a monitor at 1680 x 1050 is a function of whether one has enough framebuffer memory to hold all the information necessary to render a single frame. Once rasterized, the information is simply sent over the wire to the monitor. I will concur that a VGA connection is less than ideal than say a DVI connection since we&#8217;re talking about an analog vs. a digital connection. However, the ability to render at 1680 x 1050 is independent of that feature. You don&#8217;t need a high end graphics card to render at that resolution.<br />
Having said that &#8211; you DO need a better graphics card if you wanted to play 3D games at an acceptable frame rate. Again &#8211; a function of memory and how many shaders (and how much is done in hardware vs. software).</p>
<p>My beefs with this monitor had everything to do with brightness. Could it be indicative of the VGA connection? Possibly but if that&#8217;s the case, even that&#8217;s unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trala</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-101595</link>
		<dc:creator>trala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-101595</guid>
		<description>OK, what is your computer configuration like? You can&#039;t expect to go from 1280x1024 or whatever to 1680 x 1050 and have no quality loss if your video card sucks... You have to have a good video card that supports quality output. So, based on the information given here, your opinion doesn&#039;t necessarily mean anything at all. Having a good monitor and a mediocre graphics card is like having a Ferrari running on diesel. Ok, so thanks for nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, what is your computer configuration like? You can&#8217;t expect to go from 1280&#215;1024 or whatever to 1680 x 1050 and have no quality loss if your video card sucks&#8230; You have to have a good video card that supports quality output. So, based on the information given here, your opinion doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean anything at all. Having a good monitor and a mediocre graphics card is like having a Ferrari running on diesel. Ok, so thanks for nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-98644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 04:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-98644</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking all around my screen and i can&#039;t see any uneven brightness. I must not be that good at noticing these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking all around my screen and i can&#8217;t see any uneven brightness. I must not be that good at noticing these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-98583</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-98583</guid>
		<description>This is probably a TN panel, unsuitable for most designer/artist types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably a TN panel, unsuitable for most designer/artist types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex Python</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-98562</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex Python</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-98562</guid>
		<description>I bought this monitor as a replacement for a 10-year-old 21&quot; CRT art monitor that was starting to have issues.

I use it primarily for high-quality photo-editing, so I need precise everything.

Immediately upon playing with Adobe&#039;s &quot;Gamma&quot; settings, I realized they&#039;re useless with this monitor, it simply has too much contrast to use the &quot;Gamma&quot; system.

So I hooked up an expensive borrowed LaCie art monitor next to it, &quot;gamma&quot; adjusted it, and set about using the included &quot;Forte&quot; software to mess with the LG.

Basically, Forte does OK, but then once you close it, you have to use the monitor adjustments to set your sharpness to 5 and drop the phase to &quot;0&quot;, and brightness should be at &quot;100&quot;, contrast in the 50&#039;s (mine&#039;s at 53). Temp is 6500K, Gamma -50

And, you have to do this every time you boot, because you&#039;re using 2 separate systems to optimize it.  I&#039;ve got it down to about a minute.

So, for $200ish, you get a great monitor if you don&#039;t mind tweaking it a little every time you boot.

I sometimes get a little &quot;flicker&quot; even when I use it as a single monitor, but at this point I blame my older 2-port but only 128Mb graphics card.  As the 512Mb cards have dropped into the $60 range for my P4 small-form-factor computer, I&#039;m gonna grab one soon to hopefully eliminate the flicker.  Sometimes if I change my &quot;Phase&quot; to 50, the Flicker stops.

At least it only flickers when it&#039;s thinking hard, but if I&#039;m surfing the web after I task it to a big job, I have to surf with one of my other computers or it&#039;s a little rough.

So: there are better monitors out there, but for the contrast ratio and the colors, it&#039;s great for $200ish if you don&#039;t mind manually adjusting at every boot.

I have no noticeable &quot;fade&quot; at the edges, but I have a stupid &quot;dead&quot; bright-green pixel in the upperleft quad. 

Anyway, there&#039;s the Python follow-up for nerds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this monitor as a replacement for a 10-year-old 21&#8243; CRT art monitor that was starting to have issues.</p>
<p>I use it primarily for high-quality photo-editing, so I need precise everything.</p>
<p>Immediately upon playing with Adobe&#8217;s &#8220;Gamma&#8221; settings, I realized they&#8217;re useless with this monitor, it simply has too much contrast to use the &#8220;Gamma&#8221; system.</p>
<p>So I hooked up an expensive borrowed LaCie art monitor next to it, &#8220;gamma&#8221; adjusted it, and set about using the included &#8220;Forte&#8221; software to mess with the LG.</p>
<p>Basically, Forte does OK, but then once you close it, you have to use the monitor adjustments to set your sharpness to 5 and drop the phase to &#8220;0&#8243;, and brightness should be at &#8220;100&#8243;, contrast in the 50&#8217;s (mine&#8217;s at 53). Temp is 6500K, Gamma -50</p>
<p>And, you have to do this every time you boot, because you&#8217;re using 2 separate systems to optimize it.  I&#8217;ve got it down to about a minute.</p>
<p>So, for $200ish, you get a great monitor if you don&#8217;t mind tweaking it a little every time you boot.</p>
<p>I sometimes get a little &#8220;flicker&#8221; even when I use it as a single monitor, but at this point I blame my older 2-port but only 128Mb graphics card.  As the 512Mb cards have dropped into the $60 range for my P4 small-form-factor computer, I&#8217;m gonna grab one soon to hopefully eliminate the flicker.  Sometimes if I change my &#8220;Phase&#8221; to 50, the Flicker stops.</p>
<p>At least it only flickers when it&#8217;s thinking hard, but if I&#8217;m surfing the web after I task it to a big job, I have to surf with one of my other computers or it&#8217;s a little rough.</p>
<p>So: there are better monitors out there, but for the contrast ratio and the colors, it&#8217;s great for $200ish if you don&#8217;t mind manually adjusting at every boot.</p>
<p>I have no noticeable &#8220;fade&#8221; at the edges, but I have a stupid &#8220;dead&#8221; bright-green pixel in the upperleft quad. </p>
<p>Anyway, there&#8217;s the Python follow-up for nerds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakista</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-98370</link>
		<dc:creator>rakista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-98370</guid>
		<description>Use the DVI port.  The VGA port is crap on this monitor.  Night and day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use the DVI port.  The VGA port is crap on this monitor.  Night and day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lg Monitor</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-98149</link>
		<dc:creator>Lg Monitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-98149</guid>
		<description>I’m so glad you reviewed one of these - I have been thinking about getting one for myself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m so glad you reviewed one of these &#8211; I have been thinking about getting one for myself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Review:LG L222WT-BF 21.6 inch widescreen LCD monitor review - PC Apex Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-97824</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Review:LG L222WT-BF 21.6 inch widescreen LCD monitor review - PC Apex Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-97824</guid>
		<description>[...] That?s ultimately the path I chose and hence this particular monitor went back to Best Buy. &quot; Full Story at Krunker &#124; Technology Around the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That?s ultimately the path I chose and hence this particular monitor went back to Best Buy. &#8221; Full Story at Krunker | Technology Around the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subiner</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-97791</link>
		<dc:creator>subiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-97791</guid>
		<description>i just picked the lg222tw up at future shop in Canada, and printed right on the box was 5000:1 contrast ratio. i would think he tested old stock. the lg N.A. webs site still list them as 3000:1, but the H.K. web site have them listed as 5000:1. i have it hoooked up via dvi, and it looks fine to me. for the price of the lg222 you cant go wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just picked the lg222tw up at future shop in Canada, and printed right on the box was 5000:1 contrast ratio. i would think he tested old stock. the lg N.A. webs site still list them as 3000:1, but the H.K. web site have them listed as 5000:1. i have it hoooked up via dvi, and it looks fine to me. for the price of the lg222 you cant go wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-97737</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-97737</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read your review but I still decided to take a risk to have my own opinion on it. I bought it and I just don&#039;t see any of the problems that you posted here. Color is great, lighting was great, but i got to admit that it needed adjustments off the box. Also, it would&#039;ve been nice if it included a DVI cable, but I had one already so I didnt have a problem with that. Other than those things, I would definitely recommend this to everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read your review but I still decided to take a risk to have my own opinion on it. I bought it and I just don&#8217;t see any of the problems that you posted here. Color is great, lighting was great, but i got to admit that it needed adjustments off the box. Also, it would&#8217;ve been nice if it included a DVI cable, but I had one already so I didnt have a problem with that. Other than those things, I would definitely recommend this to everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hong</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-97711</link>
		<dc:creator>hong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-97711</guid>
		<description>The LG222WT should have 5000:1 contrast ratio, Why you say it have 3000:1. ?
Is that a old model?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LG222WT should have 5000:1 contrast ratio, Why you say it have 3000:1. ?<br />
Is that a old model?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flung</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-97664</link>
		<dc:creator>flung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-97664</guid>
		<description>Dave - no doubt. For 200+ dollars, the LCD monitor is OK - it&#039;s just about expectations setting for me. I came into this with too high of an expectation simply because I&#039;m used to LG monitors being of better quality. I&#039;ve since upgraded to an HP 22 inch monitor and I absolutely love it (more on that this weekend I hope!)

I am convinced that many people will like the LG monitor though - especially at the price level given by Best Buy. I just didn&#039;t particularly enjoy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave &#8211; no doubt. For 200+ dollars, the LCD monitor is OK &#8211; it&#8217;s just about expectations setting for me. I came into this with too high of an expectation simply because I&#8217;m used to LG monitors being of better quality. I&#8217;ve since upgraded to an HP 22 inch monitor and I absolutely love it (more on that this weekend I hope!)</p>
<p>I am convinced that many people will like the LG monitor though &#8211; especially at the price level given by Best Buy. I just didn&#8217;t particularly enjoy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flung</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/comment-page-1/#comment-97663</link>
		<dc:creator>flung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2007/11/18/lg-l222wt-bf-216-inch-widescreen-lcd-monitor-review/#comment-97663</guid>
		<description>marty - that&#039;s true. I did not test the DVI connection (unfortunately the PC I was testing did not have DVI out). It very well could be true the colors would have been better via DVI (and a sharper picture too). However, the uneven brightness would still be a deal killer for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marty &#8211; that&#8217;s true. I did not test the DVI connection (unfortunately the PC I was testing did not have DVI out). It very well could be true the colors would have been better via DVI (and a sharper picture too). However, the uneven brightness would still be a deal killer for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
