<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony HDR-FX7 High Definition Handycam Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krunker.com/2006/12/27/sony-hdr-fx7-high-definition-handycam-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krunker.com/2006/12/27/sony-hdr-fx7-high-definition-handycam-review/</link>
	<description>Technology Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsi r4</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2006/12/27/sony-hdr-fx7-high-definition-handycam-review/comment-page-1/#comment-132849</link>
		<dc:creator>dsi r4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2006/12/27/sony-hdr-fx7-high-definition-handycam-review/#comment-132849</guid>
		<description>I would think that on this caliber of camer, that sony would have made the still images a higher megapixel (They are just over 1 megapixel). I would have paid a additional fair amount to have a higher megapixel amount. One of the reasons that I chose this camera was so that I did not have to lug around my still camera, and a video camera. I still have to do that, because I would be embarrased for anyone to see the still images that the FX7 takes, after I spent $3,500.00 on it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that on this caliber of camer, that sony would have made the still images a higher megapixel (They are just over 1 megapixel). I would have paid a additional fair amount to have a higher megapixel amount. One of the reasons that I chose this camera was so that I did not have to lug around my still camera, and a video camera. I still have to do that, because I would be embarrased for anyone to see the still images that the FX7 takes, after I spent $3,500.00 on it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsi r4</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2006/12/27/sony-hdr-fx7-high-definition-handycam-review/comment-page-1/#comment-128327</link>
		<dc:creator>dsi r4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2006/12/27/sony-hdr-fx7-high-definition-handycam-review/#comment-128327</guid>
		<description>I would think that on this caliber of camer, that sony would have made the still images a higher megapixel (They are just over 1 megapixel). I would have paid a additional fair amount to have a higher megapixel amount. One of the reasons that I chose this camera was so that I did not have to lug around my still camera, and a video camera. I still have to do that, because I would be embarrased for anyone to see the still images that the FX7 takes, after I spent $3,500.00 on it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that on this caliber of camer, that sony would have made the still images a higher megapixel (They are just over 1 megapixel). I would have paid a additional fair amount to have a higher megapixel amount. One of the reasons that I chose this camera was so that I did not have to lug around my still camera, and a video camera. I still have to do that, because I would be embarrased for anyone to see the still images that the FX7 takes, after I spent $3,500.00 on it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

