<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100GB Hard Drive for the Xbox 360 in your future &#8211; NOT!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krunker.com/2006/10/20/100gb-hard-drive-for-the-xbox-360-in-your-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krunker.com/2006/10/20/100gb-hard-drive-for-the-xbox-360-in-your-future/</link>
	<description>Technology Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAMN PHOTOSHOP!!! Xbox 100GB Hard Drive DOES NOT EXIST &#124; Krunker</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2006/10/20/100gb-hard-drive-for-the-xbox-360-in-your-future/comment-page-1/#comment-28571</link>
		<dc:creator>DAMN PHOTOSHOP!!! Xbox 100GB Hard Drive DOES NOT EXIST &#124; Krunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2006/10/20/100gb-hard-drive-for-the-xbox-360-in-your-future/#comment-28571</guid>
		<description>[...] Ugh - sorry folks but apparently the news item about a 100GB Hard Disk for the Xbox 360 is fake. Yes, I and many other websites out there got fooled into thinking that there was&#160;indeed a 100GB HDD coming out in Korea. As it turns out, the image is Photoshop&#8217;d in.. ugh - I should have looked a bit more closely. Alas.. I found out via a Gizmodo posting. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ugh &#8211; sorry folks but apparently the news item about a 100GB Hard Disk for the Xbox 360 is fake. Yes, I and many other websites out there got fooled into thinking that there was&nbsp;indeed a 100GB HDD coming out in Korea. As it turns out, the image is Photoshop&#8217;d in.. ugh &#8211; I should have looked a bit more closely. Alas.. I found out via a Gizmodo posting. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

