<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet another iPod dock &#8211; this one&#8217;s called the iDOCK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krunker.com/2006/03/09/yet-another-ipod-dock-this-ones-called-the-idock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krunker.com/2006/03/09/yet-another-ipod-dock-this-ones-called-the-idock/</link>
	<description>Technology Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:11:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Weili</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2006/03/09/yet-another-ipod-dock-this-ones-called-the-idock/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Weili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2006/03/09/yet-another-ipod-dock-this-ones-called-the-idock/#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>Apple&#039;s new &quot;universal dock&quot; (the one with the same features as this &quot;iDOCK&quot; doesn&#039;t include a remote control, at least it&#039;s not listed on their online store.

The iDOCK costs about $58 while Apple&#039;s universal dock plus Apple&#039;s remote control is $68, so I guess the only advantage is that it&#039;s $10 cheaper...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s new &#8220;universal dock&#8221; (the one with the same features as this &#8220;iDOCK&#8221; doesn&#8217;t include a remote control, at least it&#8217;s not listed on their online store.</p>
<p>The iDOCK costs about $58 while Apple&#8217;s universal dock plus Apple&#8217;s remote control is $68, so I guess the only advantage is that it&#8217;s $10 cheaper&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
