<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint PPC-6700 reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krunker.com/2005/10/18/sprint-ppc-6700-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krunker.com/2005/10/18/sprint-ppc-6700-reviewed/</link>
	<description>Technology Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flung</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2005/10/18/sprint-ppc-6700-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>flung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2005/10/18/sprint-ppc-6700-reviewed/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s been a good amount of coverage recently on this phone and you&#039;re right - everything about it appears to be positive. My only real concern is the thickness of the phon which appears to be a bit more than other smartphones. It&#039;s funny - I left Sprint about a year ago now and would consider going back if I was not so fixated on possibly getting the new Windows Treo phone when it comes out for VW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a good amount of coverage recently on this phone and you&#8217;re right &#8211; everything about it appears to be positive. My only real concern is the thickness of the phon which appears to be a bit more than other smartphones. It&#8217;s funny &#8211; I left Sprint about a year ago now and would consider going back if I was not so fixated on possibly getting the new Windows Treo phone when it comes out for VW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Wabik</title>
		<link>http://www.krunker.com/2005/10/18/sprint-ppc-6700-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Wabik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 20:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunker.com/2005/10/18/sprint-ppc-6700-reviewed/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>i have been reading about this pda. i&#039;m doing my homework on it some may say. so far i like it. it seems to be better then my hp iPAQ which seems to be better then a lot of devices i have seen. thats only because i have hacked into the device and kinda modified it a bit. out of all of the devices i have read about, the ppc-6700 seems to be the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been reading about this pda. i&#8217;m doing my homework on it some may say. so far i like it. it seems to be better then my hp iPAQ which seems to be better then a lot of devices i have seen. thats only because i have hacked into the device and kinda modified it a bit. out of all of the devices i have read about, the ppc-6700 seems to be the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

